Shanghai Rolex Masters, Qualification: Aziz Dougaz vs Federico Cina
Live · in play3-6, 6-4, 3-3S3
- $59.0K
- $59.0K
- 286
- $57.4K
- $57.3K
Moneyline
| Question | Yes | No | 24h volume |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shanghai Rolex Masters, Qualification: Aziz Dougaz vs Federico Cina | 41.0¢ | 59.0¢ | $57.7K |
Completed Match
| Question | Yes | No | 24h volume |
|---|---|---|---|
| Completed Match | 53.1¢ | 46.9¢ | $15.18 |
Game Handicap
| Question | Yes | No | 24h volume |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shanghai Rolex Masters, Qualification: Aziz Dougaz vs Federico Cina Game Spread +/-3.5Quiet | — | — | — |
Set Handicap
| Question | Yes | No | 24h volume |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shanghai Rolex Masters, Qualification: Aziz Dougaz vs Federico Cina Set Handicap +/-1.5NO | 0.0¢ | 100.0¢ | $544.59 |
Set Totals
| Question | Yes | No | 24h volume |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shanghai Rolex Masters, Qualification: Aziz Dougaz vs Federico Cina Total Sets: O/U 2.5YES | 100.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $358.02 |
Match Totals
Set Winner
| Question | Yes | No | 24h volume |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shanghai Rolex Masters, Qualification: Aziz Dougaz vs Federico Cina Set 2 WinnerYES | 100.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $146.49 |
First Set Winner
| Question | Yes | No | 24h volume |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shanghai Rolex Masters, Qualification: Aziz Dougaz vs Federico Cina Set 1 WinnerNO | 0.0¢ | 100.0¢ | $55.02 |
First Set Totals
Set Games Totals
Event facts
- Category
- Tennis · ATP
- Series
- ATP · daily
- Fee
- 5% × p × (1−p) · taker only · 15% maker rebate
- UMA bond
- $250
- Dispute window
- 30 minutes
- Resolver
- UMA CTF Adapter (sports)
- Questions
- 2 open · 13 settled · 1 never traded
- Fills, last 24 h
- 631
- Polymarket-reported 24h volume
- 94,528 shares
- Created
- First trade
- Kick-off
Market details
- Category
- Tennis
- Polymarket tag
- ATP Tour
- Discipline
- Tennis
- Polymarket series
- ATP
- Teams
- Aziz Dougaz vs. Federico Cina
Who is trading this event
How does this event settle?
Rules, as written by Polymarket
This market refers to the tennis match between Aziz Dougaz and Federico Cina in the Shanghai Rolex Masters, Qualification, originally scheduled for October 6, 2026 at 12:00AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Aziz Dougaz' if Aziz Dougaz advances against Federico Cina. This market will resolve to 'Federico Cina' if Federico Cina advances against Aziz Dougaz. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or a winner has not been determined by October 20, 2026, 11:59 PM ET (14 days after the scheduled start), this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the ATP Tour. A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Each question is its own Yes/No market: a share of the side that wins pays 100¢, the other side pays 0¢.
13 of the 16 have settled; Shanghai Rolex Masters, Qualification: Aziz Dougaz vs Federico Cina Total Sets: O/U 2.5, Shanghai Rolex Masters, Qualification: Aziz Dougaz vs Federico Cina Match O/U 21.5, Shanghai Rolex Masters, Qualification: Aziz Dougaz vs Federico Cina Set 2 Winner, Shanghai Rolex Masters, Qualification: Aziz Dougaz vs Federico Cina Set 1 O/U 8.5, Shanghai Rolex Masters, Qualification: Aziz Dougaz vs Federico Cina Match O/U 22.5, Shanghai Rolex Masters, Qualification: Aziz Dougaz vs Federico Cina Match O/U 23.5, Shanghai Rolex Masters, Qualification: Aziz Dougaz vs Federico Cina Set 2 O/U 8.5, Shanghai Rolex Masters, Qualification: Aziz Dougaz vs Federico Cina Set 2 O/U 9.5 settled Yes.
The result is checked against atptour.com. Open the source
It can settle from Oct 13, 2026 04:00 UTC; trading can go on after that until the result is final.
Prices as of Oct 6, 2026 06:07 UTC; volume from on-chain fills over the last 24h. Trading data is ours; event metadata comes from Polymarket. Not affiliated with Polymarket · Not investment advice.