Rolex Paris Masters, Qualification: Tomas Machac vs Martin Landaluce
Settled
- $49.3K
- 17
- $71.2K
- $123.0K
Moneyline
| Question | Yes | No | 24h volume |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rolex Paris Masters, Qualification: Tomas Machac vs Martin LandaluceYES | 100.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $48.1K |
First Set Winner
| Question | Yes | No | 24h volume |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rolex Paris Masters, Qualification: Tomas Machac vs Martin Landaluce Set 1 WinnerYES | 100.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $1.2K |
Set Handicap
| Question | Yes | No | 24h volume |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rolex Paris Masters, Qualification: Tomas Machac vs Martin Landaluce Set Handicap +/-1.5YES | 100.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $46.87 |
| Rolex Paris Masters, Qualification: Tomas Machac vs Martin Landaluce Set Handicap +/-1.5NO | 0.0¢ | 100.0¢ | — |
Set Winner
| Question | Yes | No | 24h volume |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rolex Paris Masters, Qualification: Tomas Machac vs Martin Landaluce Set 2 WinnerYES | 100.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $5.00 |
Match Totals
Game Handicap
| Question | Yes | No | 24h volume |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rolex Paris Masters, Qualification: Tomas Machac vs Martin Landaluce Game Spread +/-1.5YES | 100.0¢ | 0.0¢ | — |
First Set Totals
Set Games Totals
Completed Match
| Question | Yes | No | 24h volume |
|---|---|---|---|
| Completed MatchYES | 100.0¢ | 0.0¢ | — |
Set Totals
| Question | Yes | No | 24h volume |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rolex Paris Masters, Qualification: Tomas Machac vs Martin Landaluce Total Sets: O/U 2.5NO | 0.0¢ | 100.0¢ | — |
Event facts
- Category
- Tennis · ATP
- Series
- ATP · daily
- Fee
- 5% × p × (1−p) · taker only · 15% maker rebate
- UMA bond
- $250
- Dispute window
- 30 minutes
- Resolver
- UMA CTF Adapter (sports)
- Questions
- 17 settled
- Fills, last 24 h
- 278
- Polymarket-reported 24h volume
- 92,822 shares
- Created
- First trade
- Kick-off
Market details
- Category
- Tennis
- Polymarket tag
- ATP Tour
- Discipline
- Tennis
- Polymarket series
- ATP
- Teams
- Tomas Machac vs. Martin Landaluce
Who is trading this event
How does this event settle?
Rules, as written by Polymarket
This market refers to the tennis match between Tomas Machac and Martin Landaluce in the Rolex Paris Masters, Qualification, originally scheduled for October 31, 2026 at 7:30AM ET. This market will resolve to 'Tomas Machac' if Tomas Machac advances against Martin Landaluce. This market will resolve to 'Martin Landaluce' if Martin Landaluce advances against Tomas Machac. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or a winner has not been determined by November 14, 2026, 11:59 PM ET (14 days after the scheduled start), this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the ATP Tour. A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
Each question is its own Yes/No market: a share of the side that wins pays 100¢, the other side pays 0¢.
17 of the 17 have settled; Rolex Paris Masters, Qualification: Tomas Machac vs Martin Landaluce, Rolex Paris Masters, Qualification: Tomas Machac vs Martin Landaluce Set 1 Winner, Rolex Paris Masters, Qualification: Tomas Machac vs Martin Landaluce Set Handicap +/-1.5, Rolex Paris Masters, Qualification: Tomas Machac vs Martin Landaluce Set 2 Winner, Completed Match, Rolex Paris Masters, Qualification: Tomas Machac vs Martin Landaluce Game Spread +/-1.5, Rolex Paris Masters, Qualification: Tomas Machac vs Martin Landaluce Set 1 O/U 8.5, Rolex Paris Masters, Qualification: Tomas Machac vs Martin Landaluce Set 1 O/U 9.5, Rolex Paris Masters, Qualification: Tomas Machac vs Martin Landaluce Set 2 O/U 8.5 settled Yes.
The result is checked against atptour.com. Open the source
Volume from on-chain fills over the last 24h. Trading data is ours; event metadata comes from Polymarket. Not affiliated with Polymarket · Not investment advice.