SportsSoccerEFL ChampionshipSettled
Birmingham City FC vs. Wolverhampton Wanderers FC - Second Half Result
$202.6K volume, 24h1,948 fills · 448 traders · 62 questions
Reported by Polymarket: liquidity $10.5K
- Created
- First trade
- Event start
Resolves via efl.com
Part of EFL Championship · daily
Moneyline
| Question | Yes | No | 24h volume |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wolverhampton Wanderers FCNO | 0.0¢ | 100.0¢ | $48.7K |
| Draw (Birmingham City FC vs. Wolverhampton Wanderers FC)YES | 100.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $24.8K |
| Birmingham City FCNO | 0.0¢ | 100.0¢ | $18.8K |
Totals
| Question | Yes | No | 24h volume |
|---|---|---|---|
| O/U 4.5NO | 0.0¢ | 100.0¢ | $20.9K |
| O/U 2.5YES | 100.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $17.2K |
| O/U 1.5YES | 100.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $15.8K |
| O/U 3.5YES | 100.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $8.2K |
| O/U 0.5YES | 100.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $7.9K |
| O/U 5.5NO | 0.0¢ | 100.0¢ | $7.1K |
Both Teams To Score
| Question | Yes | No | 24h volume |
|---|---|---|---|
| Both Teams to ScoreYES | 100.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $12.7K |
Exact Score
First Half Totals
| Question | Yes | No | 24h volume |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st Half O/U 1.5YES | 100.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $2.0K |
| 1st Half O/U 2.5YES | 100.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $755.34 |
| 1st Half O/U 0.5YES | 100.0¢ | 0.0¢ | — |
Halftime Result
| Question | Yes | No | 24h volume |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wolverhampton Wanderers FCNO | 0.0¢ | 100.0¢ | $775.71 |
| Birmingham City FCNO | 0.0¢ | 100.0¢ | $333.05 |
| DrawYES | 100.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $157.75 |
Spreads
| Question | Yes | No | 24h volume |
|---|---|---|---|
| Birmingham City FC (-2.5)NO | 0.0¢ | 100.0¢ | $363.34 |
| Wolverhampton Wanderers FC (-1.5)NO | 0.0¢ | 100.0¢ | $247.43 |
| Birmingham City FC (-1.5)NO | 0.0¢ | 100.0¢ | $203.51 |
| Wolverhampton Wanderers FC (-2.5)NO | 0.0¢ | 100.0¢ | $144.74 |
First To Score
| Question | Yes | No | 24h volume |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wolverhampton Wanderers FCYES | 100.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $166.15 |
| Birmingham City FCNO | 0.0¢ | 100.0¢ | — |
| NeitherNO | 0.0¢ | 100.0¢ | — |
Team Totals
| Question | Yes | No | 24h volume |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wolverhampton Wanderers FC O/U 2.5NO | 0.0¢ | 100.0¢ | $154.94 |
| Wolverhampton Wanderers FC O/U 1.5YES | 100.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $57.07 |
| Wolverhampton Wanderers FC O/U 0.5YES | 100.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $9.88 |
| Birmingham City FC O/U 1.5YES | 100.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $4.55 |
| Birmingham City FC O/U 0.5YES | 100.0¢ | 0.0¢ | — |
| Birmingham City FC O/U 2.5NO | 0.0¢ | 100.0¢ | — |
Both Teams To Score First Half
| Question | Yes | No | 24h volume |
|---|---|---|---|
| Both Teams to Score in First HalfYES | 100.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $61.44 |
First Half Team Totals
| Question | Yes | No | 24h volume |
|---|---|---|---|
| Birmingham City FC 1st Half O/U 0.5YES | 100.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $19.86 |
| Birmingham City FC 1st Half O/U 1.5YES | 100.0¢ | 0.0¢ | — |
| Wolverhampton Wanderers FC 1st Half O/U 0.5YES | 100.0¢ | 0.0¢ | — |
| Wolverhampton Wanderers FC 1st Half O/U 1.5YES | 100.0¢ | 0.0¢ | — |
Second Half Result
| Question | Yes | No | 24h volume |
|---|---|---|---|
| Birmingham City FCNO | 0.0¢ | 100.0¢ | — |
| DrawYES | 100.0¢ | 0.0¢ | — |
| Wolverhampton Wanderers FCNO | 0.0¢ | 100.0¢ | — |
Second Half Totals
| Question | Yes | No | 24h volume |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2nd Half O/U 0.5NO | 0.0¢ | 100.0¢ | — |
| 2nd Half O/U 1.5NO | 0.0¢ | 100.0¢ | — |
| 2nd Half O/U 2.5NO | 0.0¢ | 100.0¢ | — |
Second Half Team Totals
| Question | Yes | No | 24h volume |
|---|---|---|---|
| Birmingham City FC 2nd Half O/U 0.5NO | 0.0¢ | 100.0¢ | — |
| Birmingham City FC 2nd Half O/U 1.5NO | 0.0¢ | 100.0¢ | — |
| Wolverhampton Wanderers FC 2nd Half O/U 0.5NO | 0.0¢ | 100.0¢ | — |
| Wolverhampton Wanderers FC 2nd Half O/U 1.5NO | 0.0¢ | 100.0¢ | — |
Both Teams To Score Second Half
| Question | Yes | No | 24h volume |
|---|---|---|---|
| Both Teams to Score in Second HalfNO | 0.0¢ | 100.0¢ | — |
Market details
- Category
- Sports
- Subcategory
- EFL Championship
- Discipline
- Soccer
- Series
- EFL Championship
- Teams
- Birmingham City FC vs. Wolverhampton Wanderers FC
Prices and volume as of Sep 6, 2026 16:27 UTC. Trading data is ours; event metadata comes from Polymarket. Not affiliated with Polymarket · Not investment advice.